poniedziałek, 28 czerwca 2021

Jacek Nędzyński (impresario of prof. Jerzy Marchwiński)

 Jacek Nędzyński (impresario of Prof. Jerzy Marchwiński)


Reflections after reading Musical Partnership, a book by Jerzy Marchwiński.

Publisher;Wydawnictwo Drugie, 2018 r.


      I was extremely pleased to see Musical Partnership by Professor Jerzy Marchwiński

appear in print. Although many of the issues raised in this book have already been the subject of other

publications by the Professor, we have now received a compilation of the Author's earlier thoughts,    

but their expansion with new aspects.

      These new aspects, i.e. partnership understood not only in the purely musical sense,

may widen the circle of readers, attracting persons who are not directly connected

with musical performances and may also contribute to the continuation and further

exploration of the concept.

      The idea of partnership promoted by the author is particularly close and important for

me as an impresario of classical music performers for nearly 40 years, the more so

that the respect for the principles of partnership has always been an essential

element of my cooperation with artists. My experience has shown that the

cooperation brings the best results when the partnership is fully respected by both

parties. There is no need to convince anyone that the beginning of the cooperation

between the artist and the impresario is an extremely important moment for both; the

artist entrusts his affairs to the impresario with the assumption that he will take proper

care of the organization and support his artistic career using his knowledge,

experience and contacts, while the latter’s professional existence and reputation is

based on the artistic development, successes, and public image of the artist. For this

the reason, the contact between them should be as personalized as possible and

based on the very concept of partnership, complete openness, and honesty. In such

case, the impresario offers help that reaches far beyond the simple acquisition of

contracts, placing the artist in a comfortable position when he can wholly focus on

his artistic tasks; on the other hand, the artist treats the impresario as a partner who

works for him and who often provide quite a significant input in the final artistic

success.


      What I find most interesting in this book, however, is the aspect of partnership in non-

musical life, to which the Professor devoted more attention than in his earlier

publications. The author should be praised for his courage, because in popular

journalism and the media, as well as in the statements of the majority of prominent

people, partnership, and everything connected with it is associated with feminist and


      LGBT communities are in a way considered “guilty” of it. While many people

are verbally enthusiastic about the partnership in life, the opposite is usually true in

practice. Ambitious people, both outstanding and mediocre, tend to be attracted to

leadership and power and eliminate any possible professional or political competitors,

while common people, despite sometimes quite spectacular displays of rebellion,

usually, long for either a dominating life partner who will solve the problems of

everyday life for them, or a dominating " beloved leader" or another chairman or

the president who will do the thinking for them, tell them what to do and what to say,

and above all - what a blissful feeling – will relieve them of any responsibility.

However, the partnership is primarily co-responsibility, as the author rightly points out.

      I believe that this is the reason why Professor Jerzy Marchwiński's reflections and his

many years of professional activity aimed at realizing his life's passion, that is

popularisation and implementation of the principles of partnership - met with reserve

and even resistance of a part of the professional environment, despite general,

the superficial attitude of friendly approval. A symbolic example of this attitude maybe

the stubborn sticking to the term accompanist. Sociological laboratories and the

media show hardly any interest in the issue of partnership, which is truly surprising. I

can only hope that this publication will inspire them to explore the topic in-depth, so

that it should transgress discussions in academic or artistic communities and become

a part of the public debate.


Jacek Nędzyński

Poznań, February 10 th , 2019

poniedziałek, 14 czerwca 2021

Koncerty on-line w Akademii Muzycznej w Gdańsku, w maju 2021 roku

 Prof. Jerzy MARCHWIŃSKI

Rejowiecka 17A

PL 04-897 WARSZAWA

Tel/Fax: (+48-22) 872 1500

Mob: (+48) 601 235 576

E-mail: JMarchwinski@gmail.com

Blog: jerzy-marchwinski.Blogspot.com


Warszawa, 9 czerwca 2021

Koncerty on-line w Akademii Muzycznej w Gdańsku, w maju, 2021 roku.

Wykonawcy: (Online: GRaMuz#23 i GRaMuz#26)

Prof. Anna Prabucka-Firlej

Młodzi Artyści: Adrianna CIEMIŃSKA, Anna FENDER,

Jakub Grzelachowski, Adam BRUDEREK


REFLEKSJA:

Będzie to krótka REFLEKSJA w trzech częściach:

Część pierwsza, Osobista

Część druga, Pani Profesor

Część trzecia, Młodzi Artyści


1. Część pierwsza, osobista.

Recenzja, to teren krytyka i recenzenta. A ja, za przeproszeniem, jestem

byłym artystą-wykonawcą i z tej loży wypowiadam swobodniej swoje opinie.

Generalnie, postrzegam dwa typy wykonawców, rytmisci i melodyści (w mojej

prywatnej nomenklaturze). Rytmista, to wykonawca, który nawet „Wlazł kotek

na płotek”, nie potrafi zagrać bez liczenia i dominacji rytmu. A „melodysta”,

potrafi zaśpiewać nawet Tokatę Prokofiewa (Martha!). Przekłada się to na

logikę narracji, artykulacji i dramaturgię treści. (Rytmistów proszę o

wybaczenie, ale – dla mnie – ich granie, jest to granie o niczym).”

Złotymi zgłoskami mam wpisaną w pamięć Chopinowską refleksję:

Muzyka ma mówić, pianista śpiewać. Proszę mi wybaczyć, ale dla mnie,

muzyka bez tego pianistycznego, śpiewu, pozostaje zaledwie

zorganizowanym hałasem.


2. Część druga: Pani Profesor.

Gdybym miał jednym słowem określić postać Pani Profesor, jej walor

artystyczny, dydaktyczny oraz organizacyjny, byłby to: fenomen!

Pani Profesor przynależy do nielicznej elity preferowanych przeze mnie

pianistów śpiewających.

W moim odczuciu, przywilej ten jest dobrem powierzonym, talentem,

którego niepodobna nauczyć.

Można w nieskończoność udoskonalać profesję, jest to wykonalne, ale

jeszcze nikomu nie udało się nauczyć talentu.


To, co mogłem usłyszeć i zaobserwować w jej majowej igraszce online,

było ciągłą demonstracją śpiewu, frazy, nastroju, timingu, artykulacji,

dramaturgii akordów i kantyleny, nie wspomnę nawet o arcypartnerstwie.

Wyobraziłem sobie, jak niewymierną korzyścią dla tych młodych artystów

był nie tyle sam występ, nawet online, ile choćby nawet niedługi czas

wspólnych z Panią Profesor, inspirujących poszukiwań i treningu.

Zaimponowała mi profesjonalna, artystyczna przestrzeń Pani Profesor. W

przestrzeni tej sprawiali wrażenie wielkiego komfortu wszyscy młodzi,

współpracujący na estradzie z tą Znakomitą Artystką

.

3. Część trzecia: Młodzi artyści.

Z całą odpowiedzialnością używam wobec nich tych określeń.

Kiedy włączyłem laptopa, spodziewałem się usłyszeć jakieś standardowe,

studenckie wykonania, których miałem, po trosze z zobowiązania, wysłuchać.

Muszę wyznać, że moja radość i zadowolenie poszybowały wysoko, kiedy

spotkanie z Uczelnianym poziomem, zaczęło przedzierzgać się, zgoła – jak to

osobiście określam – w poziom filharmoniczny.

To, co mnie szczególnie zjednało w ich wykonaniu, to Wolność i

artystyczna Przestrzeń, również odziedziczone po Pani Profesor Annie

Prabuckiej oraz imponujący poziom umiejętności instrumentalnych.


(prof. Jerzy Marchwiński)

On-line concerts at the Academy of Music, May 2021

 

Warsaw, June 9 th,  2021

 

On-line concerts at the Academy of Music in Gdansk,  May 2021.

 

Performers: (Online: GRaMuz#23 and GRaMuz#26)

Prof. Anna Prabucka-Firlej

Young Artists: Adrianna CIEMIŃSKA, Anna FENDER,

Jakub Grzelachowski, Adam BRUDEREK

 

REFLECTION:

         

This will be a short REFLECTION in three parts:

Part One, Personal

Part Two, The Professor

Part Three, Young Artists

 

    1. Part One, Personal.

 

     A review is the territory of critics and reviewers. However,  I am just a former performer; this position gives me more freedom in expressing my opinions.  Generally, I distinguish between two types of performers: rhythmists and melodists (to use my personal terminology). A rhythmist is a performer who cannot even play Old MacDonald without counting and emphasizing the rhythm. And a  melodist can sing even Prokofiev's Toccata (Martha!). This translates into the logic of narration, articulation, and dramaturgy of content. (Forgive me, dear rhythmists, but in my opinion, you just play about nothing).            

     I will always remember Chopin's priceless adage that music is supposed to speak and the pianist is supposed to sing.  With all due respect,   if the pianist is unable to sing, his music is merely organized noise.

 

    2.  The  Professor

 

     If I were to use one word to describe the personality of Professor Anna Prabucka and her artistic, didactic, and organizational abilities, it would be:   phenomenal!

     The Professor belongs to a small elite of my preferred singing pianists.

     In my opinion, this privilege is a gift she is endowed with, a talent that cannot be taught.

     One can keep improving  one's professional skills and  it is quite feasible, but no one has yet succeeded in teaching a talent.

     What I was able to hear and observe in her May frolics online  was an incessant   demonstration of singing, phrasing, mood, timing, articulation, chord drama, and cantilena, not to mention perfect partnering.

     I can imagine  that those young artists incredibly benefited   not only from the performance itself, even if published online, but from the chance – even a brief one -  to enjoy the  inspiring instruction and exploration   together with their Professor.

     I was impressed by her professional, artistic space. All the young people, collaborating on stage with this Outstanding Artist, seemed to feel very comfortable there.

 

    3. Young artists

 

     In my view, this name is fully justified.

     When I turned  my laptop on, I expected to hear some standard, student performance, which I was supposed to listen to part out of obligation.

     I must confess that my joy and satisfaction skyrocketed when the expected academic standard proved to be the philharmonic standard, as  I like to name it.

     What particularly won me over in their performance was the freedom and artistic space, probably derived from Professor Anna Prabucka, as well as  the impressive level of their instrumental skills.         

 

                  Prof. Jerzy Marchwiński